Autorsko pravo i umjetna inteligencija
Autori
-
Blanka Mateša
Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Splitu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-7484
- Anton Kalebić Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Splitu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56461/rep280126.02.MKljučne reči:
autorsko pravo, pravna zaštita, umjetna inteligencija, autor, treniranje AI modela, pravna sigurnost, vladavina pravaApstrakt
Umjetna inteligencija se primjenjuje u svim aspektima života, uključujući i stvaralački dio i ima iznimno veliki potencijal. Ako polazimo od šireg društvenog interesa, takav se potencijal ne bi trebalo kočiti, jer bi njen daljnji razvitak mogao donijeti mogućnosti kakve donedavno nismo mogli ni zamisliti. Međutim, ne smije se dogoditi da se daljnjim razvojem ide na štetu autora kao pojedinaca, ali i sveopće kreativne industrije. Hipoteza u redu je da su postojeća pravna rješenja nedostatna za konkretno rješavanje ove problematike, i analizom u radu kroz primjenu znanstvenih metoda ona je, nažalost, i potvrđena. Zaključeno je da problematika odnosa umjetne inteligencije i autorskog prava proizlazi iz dva aspekta: autorskopravne zaštite AI-generiranih djela te treniranja AI-modela na zaštićenim sadržajima. Oba aspekta zahtijevaju hitnu pravnu intervenciju prvenstveno zbog osiguravanja pravne sigurnosti.
Downloads
Reference
Abbott R. I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law, Boston College Law Review 57(2016)4, 1079-1126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884
Banh L., Strobel G. Generative Artificial Intelligence, Electronic markets 33(2023), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1
Bećirović-Alić M. Autorsko pravo, Novi Pazar 2025.
Bently L., Sherman B. Intellectual Property Law, Oxford 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199645558.001.0001
Gaidartzi A., Stamatoudi I. Authorship and Ownership Issues Raised by AI-Generated Works: A Comparative Analysis, Laws 14(2025)57, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040057
Geiger C., Izyumenko E. Copyright on the Human Rights' Trial: Redefining the Boundaries of Exclusivity Through Freedom of Expression, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 45(2014), 316-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0181-3
Hajdarović M. Povijesni pregled razvoja umjetne inteligencije, Poučavanje povijesti 3(2024)1, 69-71.
Henneberg I. Autorsko pravo, Zagreb 2001.
Hristov K. Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright Dilemma, The Journal of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property 57(2017)3, 431-454.
Hugenholtz P. B. Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Europe, Oxford 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198298571.003.0014
Hugenholtz P. B., Dreier T. Concise European Copyright Law, Alphen aan den Rijn 2016.
Hwang Y., Shin D., Lee H.J. Who owns AI-generated artwork? Revisiting the work of generative AI based on human-AI co-creation, Telematics and Informatics 98(2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102266
Klarić P., Vedriš M. Građansko pravo, Zagreb 2014.
Loje G. Prava intelektualnog vlasništva, Pravo i porezi 22(2013)7-8, 69-73.
Lucas A. Traité de la propriétaire littéraire et artistique, New York 2017.
Lučić D. Nove informacijske tehnologije i otvorena pitanja autorskog prava, Zagreb 2023.
Parchomovsky G., Stein A. Originality, Virginia Law Review 95(2009)6, 1505-1550.
Paullada A. et al. Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research, Patterns 2(2021)11, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102266
Pila J., Torremans P. European Intellectual Property Law, Oxford 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198831280.001.0001
Ricketson S., Ginsburg J.C. International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, Oxford 2006.
Rocco S. Originality and Authorship in AI-generated Works: The Australian Law Copyright Law Perspective, Law and Media Working Paper Series 6(2021), 1-12.
Russell S.J., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach Third Edition, Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence, Hoboken, NJ 2020.
Samuelson P. Enriching Discourse on Public Domains, Durham, NC 2006.
Senftleben M. Generative AI and Author Remuneration, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 54(2023), 1535-1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01399-4
Stipaničev D., Šerić Lj., Braović M. Uvod u umjetnu inteligenciju, Split 2021.
Stober S., Dornis W.T. Generative AI Training and Copyright Law, Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval (2026), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15858
Velagić Z., Hocenski I. Autorstvo u hrvatskim zakonima o autorskom pravu od 1846. do 2007. godine, Libellarium 7(2014)2, 231-252. https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v7i2.204
Verona A. Pravo industrijskog vlasništva, Zagreb 1978.
Voinea Valeriu D. AI and Copyright – Who Owns AI Generated Content?, Social Sciences and Education Research Review 10(2023)1, 262-267.
Internet Sources
Badman A., Kosinski M. What is a dataset?, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/dataset, last visited: 15. 3. 2026.
Branwen G. GPT 3 Creative fiction, https://gwern.net/gpt-3, last visited: 15. 3. 2026.
Copyright Law of the United States, https://www.copyright.gov/title17/, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
European Commission. High-level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Discipline, 2019, 1, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines, last visited: 15. 3. 2026.
Horváth K. AI and Data Mining - Questions of Copyright, CMS, https://cms.law/en/svk/publication/ai-and-data-mining-questions-of-copyright, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
Legal Subcommittee Under the Copyright Subdivision of the Cultural Council. General Understanding on AI and Copyright in Japan, 2024, 17, https://www.bunka.go.jp/english/policy/copyright/pdf/94055801_01.pdf, last visited: 25. 3. 2026.
Lo K. Generative AI vs Traditional AI, https://www.blueprism.com/resources/blog/generative-ai-vs-traditional-ai/, last visited: 15. 3. 2026.
Lucchi N. Generative AI and Copyright, Training, Creation, Regulation, Study requested by the JURI Committee, European Parliament, 2025, 23, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2025/774095/IUST_STU(2025)774095_EN.pdf, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
Lučić D. Bartz v. Anthropic - Historic Settlement Regarding Piracy and Artificial Intelligence, Ius-Info, 2025, https://www.iusinfo.hr/aktualno/kolumne/bartz-v-anthropic-povijesna-nagodba-u-vezi-piratstva-i-umjetne-inteligencije-66711, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
Mucci T. The History of AI, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/history-of-artificial-intelligence, last visited: 14. 3. 2026.
Resolution of the European Parliament of 10 March 2026 on Copyright and Generative Artificial Intelligence - Opportunities and Challenges, P10_TA(2026)006, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0066_HR.html, last visited: 14. 3. 2026.
Stryker C., Kavlakoglu E. What is AI?, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-intelligence, last visited: 15. 3. 2026.
Stryker C. What are LLMs, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/large-language-models, last visited: 16. 3. 2026.
United States Copyright Office. Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence, Federal Register 88(2023)51, 16192, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-03-16/pdf/2023-05321.pdf, last visited: 25. 3. 2026.
United States Copyright Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability, A Report of the Register of Copyrights, 2025, https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf, last visited: 25. 3. 2026.
U.S Copyright Office, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/united_states_copyright_office#:~:text=The%20Copyright%20Office%20serves%20as%20the%20main,a%20department%20of%20the%20Library%20of%20Congress, last visited: 25. 3. 2026.
Zirpoli C.T. Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law, Congressional Research Service, LSB10922, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
Legal Sources
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886, TRT/BERNE/001.
WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) 1996.
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, OJ L 167, 06/06/2019.
Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights, OJ L 372, 31/10/2011.
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market, OJ L 130, 17.5.2019.
Regulation on the Council of Experts for Compensation in the Field of Copyright and Related Rights, Official Gazette, No. 38/22, 152/22.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024.
Copyright and Related Rights Act, Official Gazette, No. 111/21.
Copyright Law 1968, Official Gazette of SFRY, No. 30/1968.
Act on the Ratification of the World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty, Official Gazette, No. 06/00.
Case Law
Bartz v. Anthropic PBC (3:24-cv-05417), District Court, N.D. California, https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69058235/bartz-v-anthropic-pbc/, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening, C-5/08, EU:C:2009:465.
Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v. Helene Vandersteen and Others, C-201/13, EU:C:2014:2132.
Thaler (Appellant) v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks (Respondent), UKSC/2021/0201, The Supreme Court, https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2021-0201, last visited: 24. 3. 2026.
