PRISTUP INTERNETU IZ PERSPEKTIVE LJUDSKIH PRAVA SA POSEBNIM NAGLASKOM NA PRAKSU EVROPSKOG SUDA ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA

Autori

  • Marijana Mladenov Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe, Univerzitet Privredna akademija Novi Sad
  • Tamara Staparski Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe Novi Sad

Ključne reči:

pristup Internetu, ljudska prava, Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima, Evropski sud za ljudska prava, sloboda izražavanja

Apstrakt

Kao jedan od najvažnijih tehnoloških izuma, internet ima značajne implikacije u sferi ljudskih prava. Ove implikacije mogu biti korisne u smislu obezbeđivanja zaštite ljudskih prava, ali u isto vreme napredak u tehničkim inovacijama izaziva veliku zabrinutost povodom mogućeg uticaja na ljudska prava. U vezi sa navedenom činjenicom, dodatni izazov predstavlja i pitanje da li je pristup internetu potrebno tretirati kao ljudsko pravo. Sagledavanje pristupa internetu kroz prizmu ljudskih prava u okviru Ujedinjenih nacija je prvi put ustanovljeno na osnovu aktivnosti Saveta za ljudska prava, tačnije kroz odredbe Izveštaja specijalnog izvestioca o unapređenju i zaštiti prava na slobodu mišljenja i izražavanja. Od tog trenutka traje debata o tome da li smo svedoci procesa priznavanja i operacionalizacije novog ljudskog prava. Da li je pravo na pristup internetu autonomno pravo ili se može posmatrati samo kao deo postojećih ljudskih prava, pre svega u svetlu ostvarivanja slobode izražavanja? Rad pruža doprinos predmetnoj diskusiji kroz analizu osnovnih karakteristika koncepta pristupa internetu sa aspekta ljudskih prava, pri čemu je posebna pažnja posvećena sagledavanju istog u kontekstu primene Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. U okviru zaključnih razmatranja autori su predstavili tendencije razvoja pozitivnih i negativnih obaveza država u procesu formiranja prava na pristup internetu kao posebnog ljudskog prava. Cilj rada se odnosi na jasnu procenu mogućnosti efektivne zaštite predmetnog prava prvenstveno pred Evropskim sudom za ljudska prava.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Gosztonyi, G. The European Court of Human Rights: Internet Access as a Means of Receiving and Imparting Information and Ideas, International Comparative Jurisprudence VI (2020)2, 134-140.

Mladenov, M. Zaštita prava na privatnost u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu XLVII (2013)3, 575-593.

Oyedemi, T. Internet access as citizen’s right? Citizenship in the digital age, Citizenship Studies XIX(2015) 3-4 , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.970441

Qerimi, Q. Bridge over Troubled Water: An Emerging Right to Access to the Internet, International Review of Law (2017) 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2017.7

Reglitz, M. The Human Right to Free Internet Access, Journal of Applied Philosophy XXXVII (2020)2, 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395

Stephen, T. A human right to access the internet - problems and prospects, Human Rights Law Review XIV (2014)2, 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu011

Szoszkiewicz, Ł. Internet Access as a New Human Right? State of the Art on the Threshold of 2020, Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review 8(2018), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2018.8.03

Tăbușcă, S. The internet access as a fundamental right, Journal of Information Systems and Operations Management IV(2010) 2, 206-212.

Reglitz, M. The Human Right to Free Internet Access, Journal of Applied Philosophy XXXVII (2020)2, 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395

Wiśniewski, A. The European Court of Human Rights and Internet-Related Cases, Bialystok Legal Studies XXVI(2021) 3, 109-133. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.03.06

Case law

Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, Application no 311/10, (ECtHR 18 December 2012).

Akdeniz v. Turkey, Application no. 20877/10 (ECtHR, 11 March 2014).

Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, Applications no 48226/10 and 14027/11 (ECtHR, 1 December 2015).

Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, Application no. 60921/17 and 7202/18 (ECtHR, 30 April 2019).

Kablis v. Russia, Application no. 48310/16 and 59663/17 (ECtHR, 30 April 2019).

Vladimir Kharitonov v. Russia, Application no. 10795/14 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

OOO Flavus and Others v. Russia, Applications no 12468/15, 23489/15, and 19074/16 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Bulgakov v. Russia, Application no. 20159/15 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Engels v. Russia, Application no. 61919/16 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. v. Turkey, Application no. 25479/19, (ECtHR 24. 3. 2022).

Regulations

Council Directive 2002/21/EC, OJ L 108, 24. 4. 2002, p. 33–50.

Recommendation of 26 March 2009 to the Council on strengthening security and fundament freedoms on the Internet, European Parliament, 2010 O.J. (C.117) E/206.

Special Rapporteur’s Report on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue, Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/27, 16 May 2011.

The European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, 1952, Strasbourg: Directorate of Information.

UN General Assembly, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, 27 June 2016, A/HRC/32/L.20.

Other sources

European Court of Human Rights, Factsheet – Access to Internet and freedom to receive and impart information and ideas, March 2022. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Access_Internet_ENG.pdf, visited: 18. 5. 2022.

Mildebrath, H. Internet access as a fundamental right, Exploring aspects of connectivity, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2021)696170m, visited: 29. 4. 2022.

United Nation’s International Telecommunication Union Development Sector, Measuring digital development, Facts and Figures 2021, https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2021/, visited: 25. 4. 2022.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

12-10-2022