HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO INTERNET ACCESS WITH A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Authors

  • Marijana Mladenov Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary, University Bussines Academy in Novi Sad
  • Tamara Staparski Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad

Keywords:

Internet access, human rights, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, freedom of expression

Abstract

As one of the most important technological inventions, the internet has significant implications for human rights. These implications can be useful in terms of ensuring the protection of human rights. However, at the same time, advances in technical innovations raise major concerns about the possible influence on human rights. Concerning this fact, an additional challenge is referring to the question of whether is it necessary to address access to the internet as a human right. In 2011, the United Nations viewed internet access through the prism of human rights for the first time when the Human Rights Council adopted the Special Rapporteur's Report on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Since that moment, there has been an ongoing debate about whether we are witnessing the process of the recognition and operationalization of a new human right. Is the right to access the internet an autonomous right or it could be seen only as a part of existing human rights, primarily, in respect of freedom of expression? The paper will contribute to the ongoing discussion by providing analysis and insights into the main features related to the human rights approach to internet access with the special attention devoted to the framework of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The scope of the paper is to clarify whether the right to internet access can be assessed regarding effective protection primarily in front of the European Court of Human Rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gosztonyi, G. The European Court of Human Rights: Internet Access as a Means of Receiving and Imparting Information and Ideas, International Comparative Jurisprudence VI (2020)2, 134-140.

Mladenov, M. Zaštita prava na privatnost u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu XLVII (2013)3, 575-593.

Oyedemi, T. Internet access as citizen’s right? Citizenship in the digital age, Citizenship Studies XIX(2015) 3-4 , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.970441

Qerimi, Q. Bridge over Troubled Water: An Emerging Right to Access to the Internet, International Review of Law (2017) 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2017.7

Reglitz, M. The Human Right to Free Internet Access, Journal of Applied Philosophy XXXVII (2020)2, 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395

Stephen, T. A human right to access the internet - problems and prospects, Human Rights Law Review XIV (2014)2, 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu011

Szoszkiewicz, Ł. Internet Access as a New Human Right? State of the Art on the Threshold of 2020, Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review 8(2018), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2018.8.03

Tăbușcă, S. The internet access as a fundamental right, Journal of Information Systems and Operations Management IV(2010) 2, 206-212.

Reglitz, M. The Human Right to Free Internet Access, Journal of Applied Philosophy XXXVII (2020)2, 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395

Wiśniewski, A. The European Court of Human Rights and Internet-Related Cases, Bialystok Legal Studies XXVI(2021) 3, 109-133. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.03.06

Case law

Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, Application no 311/10, (ECtHR 18 December 2012).

Akdeniz v. Turkey, Application no. 20877/10 (ECtHR, 11 March 2014).

Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, Applications no 48226/10 and 14027/11 (ECtHR, 1 December 2015).

Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, Application no. 60921/17 and 7202/18 (ECtHR, 30 April 2019).

Kablis v. Russia, Application no. 48310/16 and 59663/17 (ECtHR, 30 April 2019).

Vladimir Kharitonov v. Russia, Application no. 10795/14 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

OOO Flavus and Others v. Russia, Applications no 12468/15, 23489/15, and 19074/16 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Bulgakov v. Russia, Application no. 20159/15 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Engels v. Russia, Application no. 61919/16 (ECtHR, 23 June 2020).

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. v. Turkey, Application no. 25479/19, (ECtHR 24. 3. 2022).

Regulations

Council Directive 2002/21/EC, OJ L 108, 24. 4. 2002, p. 33–50.

Recommendation of 26 March 2009 to the Council on strengthening security and fundament freedoms on the Internet, European Parliament, 2010 O.J. (C.117) E/206.

Special Rapporteur’s Report on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue, Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/27, 16 May 2011.

The European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, 1952, Strasbourg: Directorate of Information.

UN General Assembly, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, 27 June 2016, A/HRC/32/L.20.

Other sources

European Court of Human Rights, Factsheet – Access to Internet and freedom to receive and impart information and ideas, March 2022. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Access_Internet_ENG.pdf, visited: 18. 5. 2022.

Mildebrath, H. Internet access as a fundamental right, Exploring aspects of connectivity, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2021)696170, visited: 29. 4. 2022.

United Nation’s International Telecommunication Union Development Sector, Measuring digital development, Facts and Figures 2021, https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2021/, visited: 25. 4. 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-12

How to Cite

Mladenov, M., & Staparski, T. (2022). HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO INTERNET ACCESS WITH A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Revija Za Evropsko Pravo, 24(1), 23–38. Retrieved from http://revija.pravoeu.org/index.php/REP/article/view/54