The EU Right-to-Repair directive: why do we need legal protection of this right via imperative legal norms?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56461/rep260124.06.JKeywords:
technical goods, e-waste, unfair trade practices, sustainable production, environmental protection, protection of competition rightsAbstract
Consumer’s right to repair is unquestionable in legal documents, because the consumer who validly concluded and executed sales contract, has acquired the right of ownership of a sold item and therefor he has the right to decide whether it should be repaired or not. Also, he has the right to decide whom to trust to repair of the defective product. Repairing product is cheaper than buying a new one, especially when it comes to more expensive items such as mobile phones, computers, home appliances, etc. However, manufactures question that right by developing certain commercial practices, motivated by their desire to achieve the highest possible profits, not taking into account the need for consumer protection, the prohibition of distortion of competition, and ignoring the environmental pollution caused by premature disposal of e-waste.
The exercise of the consumer's right to repair is strongly supported by Art. 5. of Right to Repair Directive in which, among other things, the manufacturer's duty to sell spare parts and tools at reasonable prices is expressly prescribed; prohibiting manufacturers from using contractual clauses, hardware or software techniques that hinder product repair; banning manufacturers from preventing independent repairers from using original spare parts, as well as used or compatible spare parts if they comply with the quality requirements applicable to all products placed on the EU market; prohibition of manufacturers to refuse to repair the goods only because the goods were previously repaired by independent repairers or other persons, etc.
This Directive entered into force, but its implementation starts in two years, which is the estimated time needed for the member states to prepare for its implementation in accordance with the obligations imposed on them in this regard. Meanwhile, we can only hope that traders will adapt their trading practices in time (and even before its implementation begins) in accordance with its rules.
Downloads
References
Buseman, N. A Second-Generation Solution to Electronic Waste: The New York Approach, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 37(2012)2, 101-146.
DuBeau, H. A. Antitrust Law & the Right to Repair Movement: Why Kodak May Not Be Such a Bad Apple, Syracuse Law Review 74(2024)1, 275-296.
Gomulkiewicz, R. W. Considering a Right to Repair Software, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 37(2022)3, 943-988
Grant, K., et al., Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review, Lancet Global Health (2013)1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214109X(13)70101-3
Grinvald, L. C., Tur-Sinai, O. The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States, Australian Intellectual Property Journal 31(2020), 98-110.
Jovičić, K. Osnovi prestanka trgovinskih ugovora u srpskom pravu, Pravo i privreda 61(2023)3, 777-801. https://doi.org/10.55836/PiP_23305A
Lazović, V., Đuričković, T. Digitalna ekonomija Nešto već znamo, nešto nasluću jemo a nečega nijesmo ni svesni, Cetinje 2018.
Marković Bajalović, D. Proving Antitrust Damages in Civil Proceedings – The Compatibility of Serbian Law with Directive 2014/104 –, Strani pravni život LXVII(2023)4, 643-667. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_23404KJ
Mirr, N. Defending the Right to Repair: An Argument for Federal Legislation Guaranteeing the Right to Repair, Iowa Law Review 105(2020)5, 2393-2424. Kapor, V. „Član 501”, u: Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima (red. B. Bla gojević, V. Krulj), Beograd 1983.
Mitrović, D. Ugovorna garancija za kvalitet i funkcionisanje stvari, u: Pravni opus - Izbor iz radova 1957-2007, Beograd 2007.
Mitrović, D. „Član 501”, u: Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima (gl. red. S. Perović), Beograd 1995.
Moore, D. You Gotta Fight for Your Right to Repair: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s Effect on Right-to-Repair Legislation, Texas A&M Law Review 6(2019)4, 509-540. https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V6.I2.6
Perzanowski, A. Consumer Perceptions of the Right to Repair, Indiana Law Journal 96(2021)2, 361-394.
Terryn, E. A. Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law, European Review of Private Law 27(2019)4, 851-874. https://doi. org/10.54648/ERPL2019044
Turiel, J. Consumer Electronic Right to Repair Laws: Focusing on an Environmental Foundation, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 45(2021)2, 579-599.
Vizner, B. Komentar Zakona o obveznim (obligacionim) odnosima, Zagreb 1979.